The expedited review process may be applied under what condition?

The expedited review process may be applied under what condition?

• A. When the research poses significant risk
• B. When more than minimal risk is involved
• C. When the procedures pose no more than minimal risk
• D. When review is not needed

Answer: (C)

The expedited review process is specifically designed for research studies that involve procedures presenting no more than minimal risk to participants. This means that the potential risks associated with the research are not expected to be greater than those encountered in everyday life. When researchers can demonstrate that their study meets this criterion, it allows for a quicker and less intensive review process compared to a full board review, thereby facilitating faster initiation of studies that are low-risk. In contrast, options that mention "significant risk" or "more than minimal risk" would not meet the guidelines for an expedited review, as such studies require a full institutional review board (IRB) evaluation to ensure participants’ safety and ethical considerations are adequately addressed. The reference to "when review is not needed" also does not align with the expedited review criteria, since all research involving human subjects must undergo some level of review to ensure ethical standards are maintained.

The expedited review process is specifically designed for research studies that involve procedures presenting no more than minimal risk to participants. This means that the potential risks associated with the research are not expected to be greater than those encountered in everyday life. When researchers can demonstrate that their study meets this criterion, it allows for a quicker and less intensive review process compared to a full board review, thereby facilitating faster initiation of studies that are low-risk.

In contrast, options that mention "significant risk" or "more than minimal risk" would not meet the guidelines for an expedited review, as such studies require a full institutional review board (IRB) evaluation to ensure participants’ safety and ethical considerations are adequately addressed. The reference to "when review is not needed" also does not align with the expedited review criteria, since all research involving human subjects must undergo some level of review to ensure ethical standards are maintained.